Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Izurieta

Citations

  • 171 A.3d 803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed, alone is sufficient to support - 11 - J-S35017-25 a sex offense conviction.” (citation omitted)
  • recognizing it is the jury’s exclusive province to weigh inconsistencies in a witness’s testimony and to make credibility determinations
  • stating that the uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed, alone is sufficient to support a sex offense conviction
  • observing that “[t]he uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to convict a defendant.” (citation omitted)
  • finding the evidence sufficient to prove that the victim did not consent to sexual contact where she “pushed [the defendant] away and told him, ‘I can’t do this anymore.’”
  • affirming denial of defendant’s weight of the evidence claim based on argument that minor victim was not credible and testified inconsistently because determination of victim’s credibility was within exclusive province of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson, Moulton, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.