Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hunter

Citations

  • 234 Pa. Super. 267
  • 338 A.2d 623
  • 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s fingerprint found on a piece of sheet metal used to cover a window 10 feet off the ground, through which access to the building was gained during a burglary, was sufficient to identify the appellant as a perpetrator of the burglary
  • prints on sheet metal covering POE window located ten feet above ground level
  • defendant's fingerprint was found at the place of illegal entry to the burglarized premises, on a piece of sheet metal covering a broken window ten feet above ground level
  • defendant’s fingerprints were located at point of entry to burglarized business and not in a public area where defendant would have had a legitimate right of access; burglary conviction upheld
  • defendant’s fingerprint was found at the place of illegal entry to the burglarized premises, on a piece of sheet metal covering a broken window ten feet above ground level
  • unauthorized entry by former employee through window of electronics plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.