Commonwealth v. Hulehan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commonwealth is not required to present expert testimony to establish material’s patent offensiveness even if material designed for “clearly defined sexual group”
• \the United States Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of the federal constitution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).