Commonwealth v. Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The non-conforming use doctrine is invoked to allow the existence of a use prohibited by a later enacted zoning ordinance. . . . This principle, however, has no application to a business licensing ordinance regulating licensee’s conduct of his ongoing business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Baer v. Zoning Hearing Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-15· cited 8×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Scott
  Supreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
• United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
  Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
• Borough of West Chester v. Lal
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-13· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Wimberly
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-01· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Smalis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-24· cited 30×
• Lower Merion Township v. Schenk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-19· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-09-08· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Shenkin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 12×
• McGeehan v. Zoning Hearing Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-05· cited 9×
• Mt. Joy Township v. Davies Used Auto Parts
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-07· cited 7×
• Beers v. Mount Pleasant Township
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-03· cited 1×