Commonwealth v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant sentenced to twenty-five to fifty years’ imprisonment as a juvenile could not invoke Miller as an time-bar exception under Section 9545(b)(1)(iii)
• discerning that Rule 906(A) does not require the Commonwealth to contest an appellant’s petition prior to its dismissal by default
• emphasizing that the petitioner bears the burden to prove an applicable statutory exception to the PCRA timeliness requirement
• briefly citing Rule 906(A) in a case where the PCRA court did not order the Commonwealth to file an answer to PCRA petition, and the petitioner had “not met the jurisdictional requirements of the PCRA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Com. v. Kapellusch, D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-09-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
• Montgomery v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 2,780×
• Commonwealth v. Grazier
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-15· cited 1,461×
• Commonwealth v. Fears
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-19· cited 803×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-19· cited 800×
• Commonwealth v. Burton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-10-24· cited 350×
• Commonwealth v. Callahan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-09-23· cited 293×
• Commonwealth v. Perrin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-01· cited 218×
• Commonwealth v. Lippert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-13· cited 195×
• Commonwealth v. Gibson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-13· cited 29×