· 10/3/1983
Commonwealth v. Houghtlin
Citations
- 454 N.E.2d 1289
- 16 Mass. App. Ct. 691
- 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- more focused objection would have alerted judge to substance of particularized arguments urged on appeal and enabled judge to preclude admission of evidence
- “Only by means of ... a more focused objection . . . would the judge have been alerted to the substance of the particularized arguments now urged on appeal”
- “Only by means of a motion in limine, a more focused objection, or a prompt motion to strike, would the judge have been alerted to the substance of the particularized arguments now urged on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greaney, Hale, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.