Skip to main content
· 10/3/1983

Commonwealth v. Houghtlin

Citations

  • 454 N.E.2d 1289
  • 16 Mass. App. Ct. 691
  • 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • more focused objection would have alerted judge to substance of particularized arguments urged on appeal and enabled judge to preclude admission of evidence
  • “Only by means of ... a more focused objection . . . would the judge have been alerted to the substance of the particularized arguments now urged on appeal”
  • “Only by means of a motion in limine, a more focused objection, or a prompt motion to strike, would the judge have been alerted to the substance of the particularized arguments now urged on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greaney, Hale, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.