Commonwealth v. Hobson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court is empowered to modify sentence, yet “a criminal defendant and his attorney should be present during all aspects of sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Com. v. Blair, D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-03-31· cited 11×
• Com. v. Thompson, E.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-03-13· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Horsman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Hobson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-16· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Yoder
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Reed
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Parker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-25· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Hobson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 1×