Skip to main content
· 9/29/1993

Commonwealth v. Hindi

Citations

  • 631 A.2d 1341
  • 429 Pa. Super. 169
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving the trial court's decision to view the videotapes in camera before letting the defendant show the jury a slow motion or freeze frame version
  • not an abuse of discretion to prohibit slow motion replay of a videotape when enlarged still photographs taken from the video are admitted at trial
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence still photographs taken from video tape but precluded admissibility of slow motion and freeze frame from the same video tape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.