Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

  • 354 Pa. Super. 32
  • 511 A.2d 171
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]hen evidence is introduced to overcome or rebut this presumption, the question of defendant’s intent becomes one for the triers of fact … [who may] consider the presumption along with all other credible evidence presented on the issue of intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appeal, Consideration, Nor, Popovich, Sole, Wickersham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.