Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

  • 444 Pa. 75
  • 279 A.2d 170
  • 1971 Pa. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that courts do not hold pro se post-conviction petitioners to “strict rules of pleading,” and concluding that a petition, while “not artistic”, was sufficient to raise an issue requiring remand for a hearing.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Pomeroy, Roberts, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.