Commonwealth v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• without a Rule 1925 opinion, we do not have the benefit of the trial judge’s discussion of the issues presented in the post-trial motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Burchard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-24· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Mueller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-04· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Kinsel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-18· cited 6×
• Miller Development Corp. v. Union Township Municipal Authority
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-18· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Hicks
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 1×
• In re Private Criminal Complaints Filed by Clegg
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-28· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 12×