Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/25/2002

Commonwealth v. Hess

Citations

810 A.2d 1249
570 Pa. 610
2002 Pa. LEXIS 2433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “[a]ppellant cannot be penalized for failing to file a timely 1925(b) statement” where he was not served with notice of the order directing him to do so
holding that an untimely Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement did not result in waiver where, inter alia, the trial court 4 When a trial court orders an appellant to file a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b
holding that an untimely-filed Rule 1925(b) statement did not result in waiver, where the trial court docket did not indicate the date and manner of service of the court’s Rule 1925(b) order, in violation of Rule 114
holding that an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement did not result in waiver -3- J-S22024-24 where, inter alia, the trial court docket did not indicate the date and manner of service of the court’s Rule 1925(b) order in violation of Rule 114
noting that Rule 114’s language leaves no question that the trial court clerk’s obligations regarding docket entries are not discretionary
noting that Rule 114’s language leaves no question that the trial court clerk’s obligations regarding docket entries are not discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Eakin, Newman, Nigro, Saylor, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.