Commonwealth v. Herbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established that ‘the decision of the single justice, acting as a gatekeeper pursuant to G.L. c. 278, § 33E, is final and unreviewable’” (quoting Commonwealth v. Perez, 442 Mass. 1019, 1019, 813 N.E.2d 497 (2004) (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Drew v. MacEachern
  First Circuit· 2010-09-09· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Cook
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-11-21· cited 11×
• Herbert v. Dickhaut
  First Circuit· 2012-09-19· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Nassar
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-06-18· cited 7×
• Vizcarrondo v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-11-09· cited 5×
• Herbert v. Dickhaut
  D. Massachusetts· 2010-03-19· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Monteiro
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-05-14· cited 3×
• Gaskins v. Duval
  D. Massachusetts· 2009-09-09· cited 1×
• Allen v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-03-27· cited 1×
• Mandeville v. Gaffney
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2021-04-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mains v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-12-13· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Egardo
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-10-29· cited 33×
• Napolitano v. Attorney General
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-08-02· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-06-26· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Herbert
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-09· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Perez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-13· cited 11×