Commonwealth v. Henry's Drywall Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring “[i]t is not our function to consider the expediency of an [administrative] enactment or the wisdom of its provisions”
• “we are not required to blind ourselves to possi ble rationales that may have influenced the Legislature”
• all rational inferences are made in favor of legislation whose constitutionality is challenged on due process and equal protection grounds
• classification survives rational basis test “if any state of facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it”
• \It is not our function to consider the expediency of an enactment or the wisdom of its * provisions\
• “unless the statute is patently offensive, [we] will defer to the legislative finding of facts’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).