Commonwealth v. Henlen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officer had no reasonable expectation of privacy while, in his official capacity, he interrogated suspect in jailhouse
• secret recording of interrogation by prison guard suspected of theft did not violate Pennsylvania’s electronic surveillance statute, because interrogating officer had no justifiable expectation of privacy
• no justifiable expectation of non-interception where third party attended interview of suspect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).