· 3/7/1991
Commonwealth v. Heidnik
Citations
- 587 A.2d 687
- 526 Pa. 458
- 1991 Pa. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant must prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
- a defendant must prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
- Court did not undertake review of issues appellant abandoned on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, McDermott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.