Skip to main content
· 3/7/1991

Commonwealth v. Heidnik

Citations

  • 587 A.2d 687
  • 526 Pa. 458
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a defendant must prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
  • a defendant must prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence
  • Court did not undertake review of issues appellant abandoned on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.