Commonwealth v. Heard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jury’s verdicts were not tainted because the prosecution in its argument referred to the defendant as a ‘bully’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Barras
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-02-06· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Lepper
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-11-19· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. LeBlanc
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-09-17· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1974-05-16· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. King
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-07-27· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-03-07· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Ricard
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-04-03· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1951-07-26· cited 41×