Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/20/1970
Commonwealth v. Hayward
Citations
- 437 Pa. 215
- 263 A.2d 330
- 1970 Pa. LEXIS 867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- information available to defendant at time of trial is not after-discovered evidence justifying grant of new trial
- testimony of three witnesses was not after-discovered evidence where identities of the witnesses were known at trial if not before
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Beien, Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Egberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-03· cited 1×
- Corso v. CorsoAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1972-05-18· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05
- Commonwealth v. WelkLancaster County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-08-17
- Commonwealth v. NewsomeMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1972-06-20
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.