Massachusetts Appeals Court· 7/16/2018
Commonwealth v. Hart
Citations
- 105 N.E.3d 295
- 93 Mass. App. Ct. 565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judge, defense counsel, and prosecutor agreed that voir dire was proper based on court officer's report of juror making disturbing comment with racial overtones
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Rubin, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-05-23· cited 408×
- Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2017-03-06· cited 326×
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-29· cited 315×
- Commonwealth v. McCowenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-12-10· cited 95×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-06· cited 90×
- United States v. Daniel Neal HellerEleventh Circuit· 1986-04-07· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. KamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-05-08· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. PatryMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-01-24· cited 16×
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-06-20· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.