Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hart

Citations

  • 28 A.3d 898
  • 611 Pa. 531
  • 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2334
  • 2011 WL 4469985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “common and approve usage [of a term undefined by the legislature] may be ascertained by examining its dictionary definition”
  • explaining that “common and approved usage [of term undefined by legislature] may be ascertained by examining its dictionary definition”
  • explaining enticement or inducement may be promise of pleasurable reward for entry into vehicle, such as receiving money or treat such as candy; likewise, similar attractive temptation could be created with the promise of the opportunity for the child to view object of interest
  • reviewing various dictionaries to determine the meaning of “lure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.