· 10/24/2016
Commonwealth v. Harshman
Citations
- 159 A.3d 943
- 639 Pa. 179
- 2016 WL 6206700
- 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that whether a district court may award prejudgment interest on the amount of restitution implicates the legality of a sentence because it’s an issue of whether the prejudgment interest is authorized by statute
- noting prejudgment interest is based on the loss of use of the stolen money
- section 18-1.3-603(4)(a) allows for collection of a restitution award “without the time and expense necessary to file an additional civil action”
- Prejudgment interest should be awarded from the time the money is stolen “to the time a restitution award is entered.”
- “The word ‘also’ implies . . . in addition to . . . .”
- defendants must pay post-Judgment interest until the restitution order is paid in full
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.