Commonwealth v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “requirement of written notice is a simple, straightforward requirement, which the Commonwealth can readily meet, and must meet”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Quinlan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-20· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Bryant
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 1×
• Collura v. Ford
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-07-14

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Commonwealth v. Milliken
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-30· cited 128×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 125×
• Commonwealth v. Crawley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-17· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Alexander
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-11· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Stratton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Henderson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-06-24· cited 28×
• Hoffman v. Gekoski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Quinlan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Ballard
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Ball
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 3×