Commonwealth v. Harriott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that restitution ordered under Section 1106 is “proper only if there is a direct causal connection between the crime and the loss”
• explaining that restitution ordered under Section 1106 is “proper only if there is a direct causal connection between the crime and the loss”
• finding that, for the purpose of ordering restitution as part of an intermediate punishment for DUI, the act of spitting on police officers was part of appellant’s overall conduct
• stating that “a court may properly impose restitution as a probationary condition if the court is satisfied that the restitution is designed [ (1) ] to rehabilitate the defendant!;] and [ (2) ] to make some measure of reimbursement to the victim.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]here is no jury trial right if an offense bares a maximum incarceration of six months or less.”
• defendant stating, “I want to get it paid off as soon as possible as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).