Commonwealth v. Hammer
Citations
- 11 Pa. Super. 138
- 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 118
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Representing foreign insurance company — Act of 1893.</p> <p>The fact that a person represents himself as the agent of an insurance company of another state, which has not complied with the laws of this state, as an adjuster of that company and does adjust and pay certain claims due by such company, does not make him guilty of a misdemeanor within the meaning of the Act of May 10, 1893, P. L. 38.</p> <p>The object of the act was to prohibit one advertising himself as agent, etc., in some unauthorized matter which the law prohibited the company or an insurance agent to do ; the payment or adjustment of a loss is not such prohibited matter.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Beeber, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Swan v. Watertown Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1880-11-15· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-02-02· cited 9×
- Watertown Fire Insurance v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1880-01-05· cited 6×
- Hoge v. Dwelling-House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-11-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.