Commonwealth v. Hamilton
Citations
- 74 Pa. Super. 419
- 1920 Pa. Super. LEXIS 167
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Practicing medicine without a license — Act of June 8,1911, P. L. 639 — Act of July 25,1918, P. L. 1220 — Prosecution — Procedure.</p> <p>A prosecution under tbe Act of June 3, 1911, P. L. 639, as amended by section 2 of tbe Act of July 25, 1913, P. L. 1220, is not required to be brought by the Bureau of Medical Education and Licensure, conducted by the attorney general or his special attorney. As a general rule every person who is capable of taking an oath in a court of justice is competent to become a prosecutor, and there is nothing- in the language of the act which expressly limits the prosecution for the violation to the first section of the Act of June 3,1911, P. L. 639, to the Bureau of Medical Education and Licensure. The word “procedure” as used in the act must be deemed to mean the conducting- of the case. But the act does not confer upon the Bureau of Licensure or the attorney general exclusive power to bring the prosecution. An indictment duly signed by the district attorney, therefore, is properly drawn, and sufficient authority on which to base a prosecution.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Porter, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.