Massachusetts Appeals Court· 12/9/1982
Commonwealth v. Hall
Citations
- 443 N.E.2d 121
- 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1
- 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “inappropriate remarks or disruptive behavior” [of the defendant] not sufficient to require hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Greaney, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 323×
- State v. Lawson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-07· cited 58×
- State v. SoaresHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-05-08· cited 21×
- State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court· 1989-09-26· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-09-28· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-07-30· cited 6×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-04-19· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. VailesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-12-02· cited 58×
- B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary v. Don Anthony WhiteNinth Circuit· 1967-11-28· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. ChubbuckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-12-16· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. TarrantMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-11-12· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. GoldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-12-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.