Commonwealth v. Hainley, R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff was only entitled to UIM benefits if the amount of his damages exceeded the legal liability coverage
• stating that “the most a plaintiff could recover, taking together the other driver’s coverage and the plaintiff’s own UIM benefits, is the total amount of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).