Commonwealth v. Gurney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no question that defendant was being treated with antipsychotic medication during trial
• prosecutor’s argument was permissible inference from facts presented at trial and not bolstering where he stated in closing that police officers and complainant were credible because their testimony was reasonable and they had no reason to target defendant with false accusations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).