Commonwealth v. Griscom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Pennsylvania appellate courts have not determined involuntary intoxication to be a viable defense against a DUI charge
• concluding that the Pennsylvania appellate courts have not determined involuntary intoxication to be a viable defense against a DUI charge
• observing that “[w]hile involuntary intoxication may, as an abstract principle, be a defense to a crime, no Pennsylvania appellate court has yet to hold that the defense of involuntary intoxication is a viable one”
• plurality nature of case and fact that it has never been cited, compelled Griscom Court to decline reliance on Mikulan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).