Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Griffith

Citations

  • 45 Mass. App. Ct. 784
  • 702 N.E.2d 17
  • 1998 Mass. App. LEXIS 1234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor’s argument calling defendant charged with single count of distributing marijuana “drug dealer” was inflammatory and “stepped over the boundaries of permissible advocacy”
  • conviction reversed where unwarranted characterization of defendant as drug dealer saturated entire case from beginning to end
  • remarks that defendant was “entrepreneur” and “common street level dealer” unsupported by evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.