Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Green

Citations

  • 168 A.3d 173
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 243
  • 2017 WL 3124236
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel who “unequivocally denied discussing an appeal” did not provide the appellant an adequate consultation
  • holding that defense counsel was ineffective where his consultation with -6- J-S24045-18 defendant regarding his appeal rights and issue preservation was inadequate
  • stating that “we are bound by the credibility determination [of the PCRA court] that a conversation between [defense] counsel and [a]ppellant regarding appellate rights occurred.”
  • stating, conviction. Failure to provide such notice shall not render the offender ineligible to be sentenced under paragraph (2). 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9718.2(a)(1
  • “[A] claim that lacks merit is not necessarily wholly frivolous. The duty to consult arises if there is a non-frivolous issue to raise, not an ultimately meritorious issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Ott, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.