Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Green

Citations

  • 380 A.2d 798
  • 251 Pa. Super. 318
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hospital record, showing rape victim exhibited “exorciations of elbow and forehead”, held admissible as fact
  • hospital record, showing rape victim exhibited \exorciations of elbow and forehead\, held admissible as fact
  • medical report stating that rape victim exhibited “excoriations” to elbow and forehead did not involve a medical diagnosis or opinion and therefore was admissible under Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act
  • medical report stating that rape victim exhibited \excoriations\ to elbow and forehead did not involve a medical diagnosis or opinion and therefore was admissible under Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act
  • medical report stating that rape victim exhibited \excoriations\ to elbow and forehead did not involve a medical diagnosis or opinion and therefore was admissible under Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act
  • medical report stating that rape victim exhibited “excoriations” to elbow and forehead did not involve a medical diagnosis or opinion and therefore was admissible under Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.