Commonwealth v. Grayson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he statute is addressed to indecent contact; tactile sensory awareness by the victim is not mandated by the statute, and we decline to engraft such a requirement upon it.”
• “Words and phrases in a statute are to be construed according to their common meaning and accepted usage.”
• where defendant brushed his penis against the underside of the victim's jaw, evidence supported conviction of indecent assault
• where defendant brushed his penis against the underside of the victim’s jaw, evidence supported conviction of indecent assault
• defendant rubbed penis against victim’s jaw
• defendant rubbed penis against victim's jaw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).