Commonwealth v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that arresting officer’s testimony was sufficient to support conviction for driving under the influence of drugs where the defendant refused blood test but admitted to ingesting three different drugs
• applying Griffith in a case addressing the sufficiency of the evidence for a DUI conviction under subsection (d)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-24· cited 211×
• Com. Pennsylvania v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-19· cited 136×
• Commonwealth v. Leaner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-01-08· cited 105×
• Commonwealth v. Duck
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29· cited 17×
• Com. v. Duncan, H.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-04-17· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-04· cited 292×
• Commonwealth v. Hutchinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-25· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Griffith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-02· cited 118×
• Commonwealth v. Toritto
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-16· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Jarman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 93×
• Commonwealth v. Hutchins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-27· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Griffith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-02· cited 10×