Commonwealth v. Gould
Citations
- 48 Pa. Super. 528
- 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 407
Syllabus
<p>Principal and surety — Appeal bond in ejectment — Courts—Juris-' diction.</p> <p>1. Where a judgment in ejectment of one of the courts of common pleas of Philadelphia county has been affirmed in favor of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff subsequently brings an action of assumpsit upon the appeal bond in another of the courts of common pleas of Philadelphia county, and such court has maintained its jurisdiction and refused to transfer the case to the court in which the ejectment was brought, such order will not be reversed by the Supreme Court, especially when the appellant has not printed the rules of the court below and when it is impossible to see that the appellant was prejudiced in any way by the suit being brought in one court rather than the other.</p> <p>Principal and surety — Ejectment—Appeal bond — Mesne profits.</p> <p>2. Where in an action of ejectment a judgment is rendered against the defendant, and the latter takes an appeal in which he files a bond by which he and his surety undertake to pay “all mesne profits accruing after judgment,” the plaintiff in the ejectment after the af-firmance of the judgment may bring a suit upon the bond and recover mesne profits accruing after judgment without previously bringing a suit in trespass to liquidate the amount of the mesne profits.</p> <p>3. An appeal bond filed on an appeal from a judgment in ejectment by which the defendant and his surety undertake to “pay all mesne profits accruing after judgment,” is in substantial accord with the provisions of the appeals Act of May 19, 1897, sec. o, P. L. 67; and even if the bond were broader than the provisions of the act, a defense to it cannot be successfully maintained, if no question is raised that it was voluntarily executed and delivered, and that it was a direct undertaking on the part of the signers thereof to pay the mesne profits accruing after the judgment in ejectment upon the affirmance of that judgment..</p> <p>4. Where the conditions in a bond differ f
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Philadelphia v. Harry C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-03-05· cited 24×
- Commonwealth ex rel. John T. Baldwin & Co. v. YeisleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-01-18· cited 19×
- Bowditch v. GourleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-03-14· cited 14×
- Morrison v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 13×
- Gotshall v. J. Langdon & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-01-22· cited 13×
- Ohio River Junction Railroad v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-01-04· cited 12×
- Memphis, Clarksville, & Louisville Railroad v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1864-11-03· cited 8×
- Randal v. GouldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-05-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. ClipshamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-01-22· cited 7×
- Peters v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1861-02-04· cited 6×
- Warren v. SteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-01-30· cited 6×
- Clement v. CourtrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-11-21· cited 6×
- Philadelphia v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-03-03· cited 6×
- Clark v. MorssWayne County Court of Common Pleas· 1891-05-11· cited 5×
- Johnson v. HesselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-04-21· cited 4×
- Township of Hazle v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-05-11· cited 4×
- Ingham v. TracySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1836-06-15· cited 4×
- Franklin v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1863-07-18· cited 3×
- Brandmeier v. Pond Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-10-17· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. SingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-10-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.