Commonwealth v. Gore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court holds order refusing Commonwealth motion to amend information not appealable because Commonwealth could nolle pros and commence new prosecution.
• court holds order refusing Commonwealth motion to amend information not appealable because Commonwealth could nolle pros and commence new prosecution.
• order denying pre-trial motion by Commonwealth to amend bill of information did not put the Commonwealth out of court; non-appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Carsia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Medrano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-12· cited 7×
• First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. DiDomenico
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-19· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hetherington
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 110×
• Riggins Case
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-06-27· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Earp
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. DeFelice
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 33×