Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 11/29/1968
Commonwealth v. Gordon
Citations
- 242 N.E.2d 399
- 354 Mass. 722
- 1968 Mass. LEXIS 886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- hearing available under c. 30A if constitutionally required, even though statute did not so provide
- affirming dismissal of equal protection challenge to licensing scheme governing street vendors
- “in a prosecution for violation of a licensing statute which is unconstitutional on its face, the issue of its validity is presented even in the absence of an application for a license”
- no constitutional right to hearing on application for hawking and peddling license
- no constitutional right to a hearing where licensing statute provides that director “may” grant a license for hawking and peddling under G.L.c. 101, §22 after police chief certifies that applicant is “of good repute for morals and integrity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Spalding, Whio, Temorb, Cutter, Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-07-27· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-12-02· cited 69×
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-07-24· cited 60×
- Powell v. TompkinsFirst Circuit· 2015-04-15· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. LoadholtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-10-11· cited 34×
- Roslindale Motor Sales, Inc. v. Police Commr. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-05-22· cited 32×
- Massachusetts Outdoor Advertising Council v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-05-29· cited 15×
- General Chemical Corp. v. Department of Environmental Quality EngineeringMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-01-31· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. Blackgammon's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-02-18· cited 8×
- Lynch v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-07-07· cited 3×
- General Chemical v. Dept. of Envtl. QualityMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-01-31· cited 2×
- American Sign & Indicator Corp. v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-01-22· cited 1×
- Fontaine v. McAveneMassachusetts Superior Court· 1996-06-21
- Cadle Co. v. Massachusetts Division of BanksMassachusetts Superior Court· 2006-11-17
- Commonwealth v. LeeMassachusetts Superior Court· 2011-02-25
- Commonwealth v. Philip J. MarquisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2025-03-11
- Commonwealth v. Nathaniel RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2025-09-30
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court· 1960-02-29· cited 1,174×
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court· 1931-05-25· cited 395×
- Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1916-02-09· cited 142×
- Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1967-11-17· cited 116×
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-03-29· cited 78×
- Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1965-02-08· cited 65×
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-05-16· cited 51×
- MacKenzie v. School Committee of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-05-09· cited 47×
- Hall-Omar Baking Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & IndustriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-07-05· cited 42×
- Turnpike Amusement Park, Inc. v. Licensing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-01-05· cited 22×
- Howe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-02-03· cited 18×
- Nichols v. DaceyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1953-01-02· cited 14×
- Moore v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1956-01-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.