Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gordon

Citations

  • 431 Pa. 512
  • 246 A.2d 325
  • 1968 Pa. LEXIS 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the introduction of evidence is objected to at trial for a specific reason, other reasons are waived and may not be asserted post-trial for the first time
  • where the prosecutor referred to “those eyes on that killer,” we did not condone the reference, but declined to award relief
  • held: no Fourth Amendment violation where police obtained the blood from hospital workers who extracted it for medical purposes
  • held: no Fourth Amendment violation where police obtained the blood from hospital workers who extracted it for medical purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.