Commonwealth v. Goodman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in order for trial to be timely all delay beyond the one hundred eightieth day from the filing of the criminal complaint must be either excluded from the computation of the period under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(d) or justified by an order granting an extension pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c)
• in order for trial to be timely all delay beyond the one hundred eightieth day from the filing of the criminal complaint must be either excluded from the computation of the period under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(d) or justified by an order granting an extension pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ryan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-08· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Gilliam
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-16· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Manley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-06-25· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Perry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Garrison
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-03· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriquez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-09· cited 12×
• Jones v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Ressler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-08· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Kripplebauer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-25· cited 5×