Commonwealth v. Glacken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quashing Appellant's pro se PCRA petition where Appellant is represented by counsel even where Appellant's.counsel has not filed a counseled PCRA petition
• “Pursuant to our Rules of Appellate [P]rocedure and decisional law, this Court will not review the pro se filings of a counseled appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Com. v. Persaud, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-08-05· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
• Commonwealth v. Finley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
• Commonwealth v. Grazier
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-15· cited 1,461×
• Commonwealth v. Nischan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-05· cited 516×
• Commonwealth v. Jette
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-22· cited 371×
• Commonwealth v. Ellis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-27· cited 319×
• Commonwealth v. King
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-06· cited 21×