Commonwealth v. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentence outside guidelines was justified because, inter alia, the appellant disregarded earlier opportunity to reform
• holding that sentence outside guidelines was justified because, inter alia, the appellant disregarded earlier opportunity to reform
• allegation sentence is outside of the guidelines and unreasonable is reviewable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bowen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-01· cited 246×
• Commonwealth v. Marts
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-14· cited 208×
• Commonwealth v. Shull
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-13· cited 117×
• Commonwealth v. Hess
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-12· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Guth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-24· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-25· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Lawhead
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-04-21
• Commonwealth v. Holmes
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-07-16
• Commonwealth v. Hart
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
• Commonwealth v. Krause
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 170×
• Commonwealth v. Dalberto
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-19· cited 152×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-16· cited 60×