Commonwealth v. Gauthier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absence of written motion \was no trifling procedural omission; the sharply limited exception to the rape-shield statute is not to be made available on the basis of surprise and snap reaction by a trial judge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bishop
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-08-16· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Wojcik
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-10-08· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Pyne
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-07-23· cited 9×
• Shaw v. United States
  D. South Dakota· 1993-01-22· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Delaney
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-07-13· cited 4×
• State v. Knox
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-11-15· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Saunders
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-08-21
• Commonwealth v. Sousa
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-10-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Stockhammer
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-01· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Dominico
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1974-01-31· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Ruffen
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-05-12· cited 56×
• Commonwealth v. Hogan
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-03-20· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Simcock
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-08-06· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Rathburn
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-12-28· cited 22×