Commonwealth v. Gant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “collateral estoppel does not apply, and any dicta to the contrary in Iverson must also be disregarded because it conflicts with long-standing principles of collateral estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. A.R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-15· cited 32×
• Com. v. AR
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-15

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Bartkus v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 1,084×
• Abbate v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1959-03-30· cited 835×
• Commonwealth v. Lagana
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-25· cited 62×
• United States v. Robert Grimes, Iodis Robinson, Shahid Ali, Formerly Known as Iodis X. Robinson
  Third Circuit· 1981-02-02· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Lagana
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-07· cited 36×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Garland v. Ashe
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1942-04-20· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Camperson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-02· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Anthony
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-18· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Traitz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-07· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-11-16· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Iverson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-14· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-02· cited 7×