Commonwealth v. Galletta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claim “that the trial court ‘failed to state on the record adequate reasons for imposing a sentence in excess of the aggravated 1 Moreover, the sentencing court had the benefit of a pre-sentence investigation report (PSI
• finding that in a violation of parole, the court is not free to impose a new sentence
• finding that in a violation of parole, the court is not free to impose a new sentence
• claim of excessive sentence cannot be addressed in context of review of parole revocation
• claim parole revocation sentence was harsh and excessive not cognizable claim on appeal
• question is whether sentencing court balanced relevant factors and imposed reasonable sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).