Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gagnon

Citations

  • 430 Mass. 348
  • 718 N.E.2d 1254
  • 1999 Mass. LEXIS 673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “produce[s] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
  • evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “producéis] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
  • evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “pro-ducéis] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
  • “where the identity of the killer is the only live issue at trial, any error in the malice instruction is not prejudicial because the defendant’s state of mind is not in dispute. The issue is the identity of the perpetrator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.