Commonwealth v. Frye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “[i]n conducting the due diligence inquiry, our jurisprudence has excused such delay resulting from court congestion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Maddrey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-02-22· cited 159×
• Commonwealth v. Martz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-06· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Riley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-05· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Staten
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-02· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Bradford
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-08-04· cited 12×
• Knox v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-10-07· cited 11×
• Com. v. Graves, N.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-11-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Preston
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-13· cited 536×
• Commonwealth v. Hunt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-10· cited 227×
• Commonwealth v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-17· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Bridges
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 133×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-27· cited 120×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-07· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-19· cited 44×
• McHugh v. Proctor Gamble Paper Products Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-26· cited 22×