Skip to main content
· 5/27/1994

Commonwealth v. Fruchtman

Citations

  • 633 N.E.2d 369
  • 418 Mass. 8
  • 1994 Mass. LEXIS 304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting judge to overrule constitutionally impermissible challenge rather than strike venire and recommence jury selection
  • upholding judge’s conclusion that defendant did not have legitimate gender-neutral reasons for peremptory challenges and judge’s rejection of defendant’s challenges to women based on their employment
  • upholding denial of peremptory challenges on basis of judge’s “conclu[sion] that the defendant did not have legitimate gender-neutral reasons” for his challenges to some, but not all, of the women he challenged
  • “The determination whether the defendant’s explanation for each challenge was sufficient to establish a nondiscriminatory basis [is] within the judge’s discretion”
  • allowed challenge to a woman whose husband was a police officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, Greaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.