Commonwealth v. Freeman
Citations
- 166 Pa. 332
- 31 A. 115
- 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1205
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law—Murder—Jury—Jury-wheel — Motion to quash array— Delay—Laches—•Waiver—Practice, 0. & T.—Act of Feb. 21, 1814.</p> <p>On the trial of an indictment for murder where the prisoner has been duly arraigned and pleaded not guilty, and four jurymen have been selected and sworn, a motion to quash the array for the reason that the jury-wheel had not been properly sealed, is too late, under the act of Feb. 21, 1814, 6 Sm. L. Ill, and will not be entertained.</p> <p>In such a case the presumption is that the prisoner, on an inspection of the array after drawing, is content to be tried by a jury selected therefrom without inquiry as to whether the strict requirements of the law were observed preparatory to the drawing.</p>
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrbtt, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-02-13· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. HainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1914-07-15· cited 14×
- McComb v. Fourth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1913-10-15· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. BorsoNorthampton County Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1947-06-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.