Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/7/2009
Commonwealth v. Fransen
Citations
- 986 A.2d 154
- 2009 Pa. Super. 235
- 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4484
- 2009 WL 4547563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding PCRA petitioner who obtains resinstatement of direct appeal rights is not entitled to reinstatement of post- sentence rights nunc pro tunc if he did not request that relief with the PCRA court
- “It is well-settled that we may not address claims that were not first raised with the PCRA court.”
- PCRA petitioner-appellant must plead in PCRA petition that he was deprived of right to file post-sentence motion in order to be entitled to relief on that issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panella, Freedberg, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-15· cited 1,461×
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-29· cited 725×
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 478×
- Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-29· cited 346×
- Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 311×
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-19· cited 278×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-26· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. ListonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-17· cited 182×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-13· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. LevanduskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-02· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. O'BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-16· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-07· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. ListonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-01-06· cited 32×
- Com. v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-26· cited 29×
- Perez v. Oakland County, MichiganSupreme Court· 2007-10-01· cited 21×
- Morley v. Ontos, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-23· cited 11×
- Com. v. FrostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-04· cited 4×
- Com. v. FransenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.