Commonwealth v. Franklin, C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but reject ing the claim at issue
• holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue
• holding that “the two-part Stride-land v. Washington [ 5 ] test applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel”
• holding that the Strickland test applies to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in plea bargaining
• holding that \the two-part Strickland v. Washington test applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.\
• holding that a plea was voluntary and intelligent despite the state’s failure to supply the defendant with information about his parole eligibility date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).